Market Loss Assistance Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,556
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $46,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Crescent Valley Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $92,661 |
62 | Mcphee Farms LLC | Kinde, MI 48445 | $92,432 |
63 | Schulze Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $92,170 |
64 | Big-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $92,045 |
65 | Krohn Brothers LLC | Elkton, MI 48731 | $91,061 |
66 | Jerome Volmering | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $90,345 |
67 | Greenfield Farm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $90,169 |
68 | Denson Smith | Caseville, MI 48725 | $90,047 |
69 | Jerald Peterson | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $89,615 |
70 | Palms Boys LLC | Palms, MI 48465 | $88,908 |
71 | Donald Harry Rickett Jr | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $87,055 |
72 | Elwin Richardson | Snover, MI 48472 | $86,733 |
73 | E & R Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $86,732 |
74 | Little-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $86,372 |
75 | M K D | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $86,100 |
76 | D & R Henne Farms Inc | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $85,653 |
77 | Kirkpatrick Farms | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $85,247 |
78 | Mcleod Farms | Brown City, MI 48416 | $84,474 |
79 | Szymanski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $84,092 |
80 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $81,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”