Margin Protection Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 122
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $1,606,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLC | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $11,034 |
62 | Phillips Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $11,029 |
63 | Daniel J Van Erp | Ubly, MI 48475 | $10,732 |
64 | Harvey Klee | Ruth, MI 48470 | $10,264 |
65 | Rick Sutton | Marlette, MI 48453 | $10,023 |
66 | Richard Eugene Mcphail | Marlette, MI 48453 | $9,896 |
67 | Darrin Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $9,651 |
68 | Daryl Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $9,651 |
69 | David M Varosi | Snover, MI 48472 | $9,625 |
70 | Shell Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $9,608 |
71 | Alan Simons | East China, MI 48054 | $9,460 |
72 | Blumerich Farms | Berlin, MI 48002 | $9,259 |
73 | Scholtz Family Farms LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $8,962 |
74 | Gary A Schultz | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $8,704 |
75 | Timothy Paul Demaray | Melvin, MI 48454 | $8,701 |
76 | Arnold Schuman | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $7,982 |
77 | Matthew John Fischer | Marlette, MI 48453 | $7,830 |
78 | Arlen Kundinger | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $7,665 |
79 | Richard W Zacharias | China, MI 48054 | $7,577 |
80 | Steven Alexander | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $7,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”