Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,992

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
81Lauwers Farms IncAlmont, MI 48003$115,766
82Douglas J VolmeringHarbor Beach, MI 48441$115,295
83Shupe Dairy IncElkton, MI 48731$115,041
84Deann ProtzmanCaseville, MI 48725$115,000
85Quandt Farms IncPeck, MI 48466$114,152
86Schulze Farms IncPigeon, MI 48755$113,157
87Volmering Family Dairy IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$112,565
88Gingrich Farms, LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$110,288
89John Gough Farms IncDeckerville, MI 48427$110,174
90Stephen GayariPigeon, MI 48755$110,073
91Christopher M OsentoskiCass City, MI 48726$110,017
92Huggett Sod Farm IncMarlette, MI 48453$109,703
93Thomas SmaglinskiPort Hope, MI 48468$109,335
94Stolicker Farms IncPalms, MI 48465$109,281
95Tait Farms IncCaseville, MI 48725$108,997
96Hwr Farms LLCMarlette, MI 48453$108,749
97Kohl Farms LLCGagetown, MI 48735$108,205
98Weber Bros IncMinden City, MI 48456$107,846
99J & L Farms LLCSebewaing, MI 48759$107,787
100Richard VolmeringHarbor Beach, MI 48441$106,271

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag