Farm Subsidy information
10th District of Michigan
(Rep. Paul Mitchell)
Total Subsidies in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 8,602
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $783,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kirkpatrick Farms | Kinde, MI 48445 | $1,040,388 |
82 | Richard Meikle | Lynn, MI 48097 | $1,031,499 |
83 | Albert F Hass | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,030,913 |
84 | Murawski Farms | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $1,029,877 |
85 | W.a. Herford & Sons Farms, Inc. | Elkton, MI 48731 | $1,026,051 |
86 | Miller Farms | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,024,426 |
87 | Leslie Weiss Jr | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,022,798 |
88 | Jahn Farms LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,012,210 |
89 | Robert Cleary | Minden City, MI 48456 | $994,588 |
90 | Dorman Farms | Snover, MI 48472 | $992,124 |
91 | Edward H Fahley | Emmett, MI 48022 | $991,599 |
92 | Darrin Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $991,409 |
93 | Helena Valley Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $981,577 |
94 | Elwin Richardson | Snover, MI 48472 | $980,285 |
95 | Gro Green Acres | Owendale, MI 48754 | $977,396 |
96 | Crescent Valley Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $976,806 |
97 | Bowers Farms | Peck, MI 48466 | $975,745 |
98 | Dennis A Hanson | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $967,902 |
99 | Christopher M Osentoski | Cass City, MI 48726 | $964,225 |
100 | Rodzos Family Farms Inc | Riley, MI 48041 | $960,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”