Counter Cyclical Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,607
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $17,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Grout Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $34,377 |
82 | Cedar Pond Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $34,219 |
83 | Elwin Richardson | Snover, MI 48472 | $33,885 |
84 | Christopher Martin Guza | Ubly, MI 48475 | $33,764 |
85 | Merlin Stewart Larson | Croswell, MI 48422 | $33,388 |
86 | Phillips Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $33,252 |
87 | Richard L Townsend | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $33,036 |
88 | Szymanski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $33,004 |
89 | Dorman Farms | Snover, MI 48472 | $32,898 |
90 | Robert Cleary | Minden City, MI 48456 | $32,892 |
91 | Tait Farms Inc | Caseville, MI 48725 | $32,654 |
92 | Stolicker Farms Inc | Palms, MI 48465 | $32,496 |
93 | Busemann Cattle Co Inc | Columbus, MI 48063 | $32,337 |
94 | Alvin Ferguson | Allenton, MI 48002 | $32,210 |
95 | D E Mann & Son | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $31,590 |
96 | Gruehn Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $31,441 |
97 | Brian T Stamp Estate | Marlette, MI 48453 | $31,357 |
98 | Morell Farms Inc | Cass City, MI 48726 | $31,286 |
99 | Crescent Valley Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $31,143 |
100 | Jack Sturm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $30,859 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”