Market Gains in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 320
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $4,971,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $16,272 |
82 | Truman Albert Terpenning | Marlette, MI 48453 | $15,955 |
83 | Albert D Terpenning | Marlette, MI 48453 | $15,955 |
84 | Edward Howard Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $15,788 |
85 | Houghtaling Farms | Reese, MI 48757 | $15,535 |
86 | Gordon Earl Landsburg | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $15,300 |
87 | Keith R Hummel | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $15,113 |
88 | Merle Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $15,015 |
89 | Steven Jolley | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $14,930 |
90 | Dennis Jay Gardner | Croswell, MI 48422 | $14,714 |
91 | Marjorie Ann Stein | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $14,629 |
92 | Brian W Fraleigh | Brown City, MI 48416 | $14,571 |
93 | Donald J Long | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $14,343 |
94 | James Krohn | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $14,219 |
95 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $13,860 |
96 | Thomas Hillock | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $13,760 |
97 | Willow Lane Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $13,680 |
98 | Louis A Gottschalk Jr | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $13,572 |
99 | Carl L Rader | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $13,557 |
100 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $13,315 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”