Total Commodity Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,066
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $26,679,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Daniel Schroeder | Minden City, MI 48456 | $67,558 |
82 | Justin Mark Gentner | Ruth, MI 48470 | $66,104 |
83 | Terpenning Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $64,330 |
84 | Bradley I Stine | Ubly, MI 48475 | $63,829 |
85 | Berville Farms LLC | Mussey, MI 48014 | $63,386 |
86 | Shell Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $63,139 |
87 | Helena Cattle Company LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $62,451 |
88 | Helena Farms LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $62,451 |
89 | Gary R Nugent | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $60,599 |
90 | Gary L Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $60,419 |
91 | Deann Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $60,419 |
92 | Grekowicz Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $60,403 |
93 | Mark H Johnston | Peck, MI 48466 | $59,973 |
94 | Jeffrey A Furness | Yale, MI 48097 | $59,418 |
95 | Leslie Weiss Jr | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $59,331 |
96 | Guza Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $58,598 |
97 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $58,539 |
98 | Loren Wayne Iseler | Peck, MI 48466 | $58,262 |
99 | Denson Smith | Caseville, MI 48725 | $57,485 |
100 | Mcleod Farms LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $57,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”