Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,080

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $30,081,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
101Gro Green AcresOwendale, MI 48754$57,655
102Larry William RoggenbuckHarbor Beach, MI 48441$57,000
103David LeavinePort Austin, MI 48467$56,941
104Scharrer Dairy LLCMinden City, MI 48456$56,761
105Randy Michael WeberUbly, MI 48475$56,632
106Michael R KirschHarbor Beach, MI 48441$56,424
107Reithel Farms IncSebewaing, MI 48759$55,823
108S & I IncPigeon, MI 48755$55,610
109Henry Ziel JrPort Austin, MI 48467$55,071
110Bradley I StineUbly, MI 48475$54,124
111Darrin WolschlegerHarbor Beach, MI 48441$53,587
112Daryl WolschlegerHarbor Beach, MI 48441$53,543
113Alan SimonsEast China, MI 48054$53,198
114Welter Dairy Farms LLCCroswell, MI 48422$52,407
115Brown Dairy IncSandusky, MI 48471$51,432
116Essenmacher Farms LLCHarbor Beach, MI 48441$50,873
117Thomas Roberts Farms IncPalms, MI 48465$50,549
118Messing Sons LLCRuth, MI 48470$50,382
119Roy W Collings IIBad Axe, MI 48413$49,174
120Sharon A CollingsBad Axe, MI 48413$49,126

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag