Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,992

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
101T L Bushey LLCCaseville, MI 48725$106,079
102Cardinal Dairy LLCPort Hope, MI 48468$105,100
103Mr Daniel E BalcerHarbor Beach, MI 48441$104,818
104R & B Farms IncBad Axe, MI 48413$103,068
105K-d Acres IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$103,054
106Jag Farms IncSebewaing, MI 48759$102,540
107Ruggles Farms LLCMarlette, MI 48453$102,476
108Cb Gremel Farms IncSebewaing, MI 48759$102,012
109John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLCBay Port, MI 48720$101,769
110Gary L ProtzmanCaseville, MI 48725$100,000
111Mark H JohnstonPeck, MI 48466$99,946
112Justin Mark GentnerRuth, MI 48470$99,679
113Stone BrothersSandusky, MI 48471$99,676
114Lewis Farms LLCClyde, MI 48049$99,496
115C & H Heussner Farms LLCMarlette, MI 48453$99,426
116Sawmill Creek Farms LLCRichmond, MI 48062$99,351
117Triple R FarmsSnover, MI 48472$98,713
118T & H FarmsPort Austin, MI 48467$97,559
119Lena Margaret MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$96,850
120Lamb Dairy FarmJeddo, MI 48032$96,051

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag