Market Gains in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 320
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $4,971,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Fred West | Croswell, MI 48422 | $13,046 |
102 | Raymond D Hartwick | Applegate, MI 48401 | $12,823 |
103 | Andrew John Parr | Brown City, MI 48416 | $12,491 |
104 | James Robert Storm | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $12,470 |
105 | Douglas J Knoerr | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $12,438 |
106 | John Knoerr | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $12,438 |
107 | Burgess Acres LLC | Croswell, MI 48422 | $12,295 |
108 | Ridge Run Farms | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $12,180 |
109 | Brown Farm Partnership | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $12,178 |
110 | Michael Shaw | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $11,999 |
111 | Timothy M Mccoy | Filion, MI 48432 | $11,920 |
112 | Ronald William Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $11,889 |
113 | Gary West | Croswell, MI 48422 | $11,871 |
114 | Constance Ann Kreger | Snover, MI 48472 | $11,422 |
115 | E & R Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $11,184 |
116 | John Raymond Gillig | Decker, MI 48426 | $10,761 |
117 | Holdwick Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $10,697 |
118 | Robert W Haskin | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $10,608 |
119 | Lena Margaret Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $10,603 |
120 | William George Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $10,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”