Market Loss Assistance Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,556
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $46,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Paul Ruthko | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $76,489 |
102 | Edward Gibbs | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $76,462 |
103 | Dennis Arnold Quandt | Peck, MI 48466 | $76,256 |
104 | Jack Sturm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $76,132 |
105 | Tyrone F Lubeski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $76,037 |
106 | Wayne F Lubeski | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $76,037 |
107 | Dale Schuette | Elkton, MI 48731 | $75,331 |
108 | Donald Schuette | Elkton, MI 48731 | $75,331 |
109 | Henry Ziel Jr | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $75,162 |
110 | Noll Dairy Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $74,655 |
111 | Tom Haag Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $74,456 |
112 | Daniel Martin Cook | Peck, MI 48466 | $74,306 |
113 | B & J Farms | Lynn, MI 48097 | $74,185 |
114 | Thumb Swine Enterprises | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $74,018 |
115 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $73,115 |
116 | Randy Sturm Farms | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $73,108 |
117 | Triple M Farms | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $73,054 |
118 | Bruce Baur | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $72,648 |
119 | Jeffrey Steven Eager | Brown City, MI 48416 | $72,522 |
120 | David George Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $72,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”