Total Commodity Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,066
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $26,679,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | R & G Hooper Farms, Inc. | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $57,144 |
102 | Blumerich Farms | Berlin, MI 48002 | $56,793 |
103 | Dorothy Sanford | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $56,209 |
104 | Douglas J Volmering | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $55,806 |
105 | K & J Farms LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $54,132 |
106 | Donald H Rickett III | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $53,170 |
107 | Tait Farms Inc | Caseville, MI 48725 | $53,008 |
108 | Daryl Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $52,700 |
109 | Darrin Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $52,685 |
110 | B.w. Hulett Farms Inc | Greenwood, MI 48006 | $52,313 |
111 | T & H Farms | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $52,312 |
112 | Clear Creek Farms Inc. | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $51,879 |
113 | Daniel J Van Erp | Ubly, MI 48475 | $51,388 |
114 | Lewis Farms LLC | Clyde, MI 48049 | $51,288 |
115 | Maple Grove Acres Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $51,116 |
116 | Gordon Brothers & Sons Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $50,928 |
117 | Quandt Farms Inc | Peck, MI 48466 | $50,821 |
118 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $50,801 |
119 | Lauwers Farms Inc | Almont, MI 48003 | $50,664 |
120 | Dave Walsh Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $50,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”