Counter Cyclical Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,607
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $17,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Spezia-bruce & Sons | Brown City, MI 48416 | $28,712 |
122 | Lynn Knust | Peck, MI 48466 | $28,589 |
123 | Douglas J Knoerr | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $28,503 |
124 | John Knoerr | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $28,503 |
125 | Bruce Jay Gardner | Yale, MI 48097 | $28,363 |
126 | Rodzos Family Farms Inc | Riley, MI 48041 | $28,249 |
127 | Sharrard Farms LLC | Peck, MI 48466 | $28,169 |
128 | Iseler Dairy-89 | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $28,150 |
129 | Jeffrey Steven Eager | Brown City, MI 48416 | $28,104 |
130 | Randy Sturm Farms | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $28,040 |
131 | Daniel Strickler | Peck, MI 48466 | $27,992 |
132 | Terry Sturm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $27,943 |
133 | Michael Shaw | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $27,919 |
134 | Ridge Run Farms | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $27,790 |
135 | Michael E Rice | Kinde, MI 48445 | $27,774 |
136 | Noll Dairy Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $27,672 |
137 | Atwater Farms Inc | Ubly, MI 48475 | $27,656 |
138 | David H Barker | Palms, MI 48465 | $27,645 |
139 | Jeffrey Brown | Grant Township, MI 48032 | $27,455 |
140 | Lee's Dairy Farm LLC | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $27,082 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”