Deficiency Payment in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,244
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $6,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ray Burton Grimes | Melvin, MI 48454 | $11,861 |
122 | Thumb Swine Enterprises | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $11,722 |
123 | Mark H Johnston | Peck, MI 48466 | $11,668 |
124 | Morell Dairy Farms Inc | Cass City, MI 48726 | $11,594 |
125 | Leslie Weiss | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $11,565 |
126 | Merlin Stewart Larson | Croswell, MI 48422 | $11,539 |
127 | Eugene Volmering | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $11,513 |
128 | Richard Meikle | Lynn, MI 48097 | $11,458 |
129 | Horst Farms | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $11,430 |
130 | Robert B Burgess | Brown City, MI 48416 | $11,354 |
131 | Kenneth Wadsworth | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $11,347 |
132 | Shell Farms | Croswell, MI 48422 | $11,252 |
133 | John Baranic Jr | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $11,224 |
134 | Noll Dairy Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $11,088 |
135 | Jeffrey Steven Eager | Brown City, MI 48416 | $10,995 |
136 | Roger Frostic | Applegate, MI 48401 | $10,717 |
137 | Rodney Alan Christner | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $10,462 |
138 | Cedar Pond Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $10,451 |
139 | Robert Thiel | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $10,346 |
140 | Bruce Baur | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $10,232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”