Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,992

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
141D & D Farms IncRuth, MI 48470$88,654
142Gordon Brothers & Sons IncCroswell, MI 48422$88,433
143F. R. B. Farms, LLCPort Austin, MI 48467$86,633
144Dale J GentnerMinden City, MI 48456$86,371
145B & B Sod IncLynn, MI 48097$86,356
146Dave Walsh Farms LLCUbly, MI 48475$85,627
147Jeffrey M ShinnCroswell, MI 48422$85,553
148Brian D KargHarbor Beach, MI 48441$85,472
149Donald H Rickett IIICarsonville, MI 48419$84,931
150David SteinkopfSnover, MI 48472$84,647
151Twin Hill Farms IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$84,635
152Cedar Pond Farms IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$84,086
153Edward Howard MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$84,037
154Beck Sod Farm IncPalms, MI 48465$83,771
155E & B Miller FarmsBad Axe, MI 48413$83,739
156Jeffery D GroutCroswell, MI 48422$82,949
157Walls Brothers Farm IncCroswell, MI 48422$82,799
158Steven E Krohn Farms LLCElkton, MI 48731$82,349
159Terry Wayne KrohnElkton, MI 48731$82,325
160Nicholas Randall DhyseKinde, MI 48445$82,222

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag