Market Gains in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 320
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $4,971,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Cedar Pond Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $8,432 |
142 | Steven Edward Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $8,357 |
143 | Gene E Burgess | Brown City, MI 48416 | $8,083 |
144 | William J Allen Jr | Croswell, MI 48422 | $8,070 |
145 | Jeffrey J Parr | Brown City, MI 48416 | $7,975 |
146 | Richard Palmateer | Allenton, MI 48002 | $7,900 |
147 | Jeffrey A Furness | Yale, MI 48097 | $7,797 |
148 | Daniel Robert Parr | Brown City, MI 48416 | $7,736 |
149 | Brent Banks | Brown City, MI 48416 | $7,719 |
150 | Ronald J Hyzer | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $7,582 |
151 | Clifford Camby Keesler | Brown City, MI 48416 | $7,421 |
152 | Melvin Gingrich | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $7,361 |
153 | Timothy Fisher | Filion, MI 48432 | $7,335 |
154 | Oliver Wood | Marlette, MI 48453 | $7,210 |
155 | David Michael Dekoski | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $7,210 |
156 | Dennis L Karg | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $7,200 |
157 | Baranski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $7,127 |
158 | Clarence M Ruth | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $7,052 |
159 | Elaine Grimes | Melvin, MI 48454 | $6,961 |
160 | Gary E Hood | Marlette, MI 48453 | $6,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”