Market Loss Assistance Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 3,556
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $46,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Shi-lac Farms | Croswell, MI 48422 | $58,084 |
162 | Robert D Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $57,970 |
163 | Nelson Rugenstein | Brown City, MI 48416 | $57,759 |
164 | John E Nielsen | Brown City, MI 48416 | $57,698 |
165 | David H Barker | Palms, MI 48465 | $57,577 |
166 | Michael E Rice | Kinde, MI 48445 | $57,498 |
167 | Randy Stone | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $57,471 |
168 | Roger Frostic | Applegate, MI 48401 | $56,817 |
169 | Alvin Gnagey | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $56,763 |
170 | Donald J Koning | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $56,505 |
171 | Keith Gentner | Minden City, MI 48456 | $56,191 |
172 | Mark Gentner | Minden City, MI 48456 | $56,191 |
173 | Ronald Thiel | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $56,149 |
174 | Tait Farms Inc | Caseville, MI 48725 | $55,727 |
175 | Gale Schultz | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $55,206 |
176 | Roger Elenbaum | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $54,822 |
177 | John N Geiger | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $54,487 |
178 | Banks Farms Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $54,406 |
179 | Willow Creek Farms Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $54,302 |
180 | R & B Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $54,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”