Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,485

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $69,384,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
41Palms Boys LLCPalms, MI 48465$200,031
42Dale Stamp FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$199,637
43Wessel Bros & Son LLCColumbus, MI 48063$196,071
44Jeffery D GroutCroswell, MI 48422$194,580
45Donald Harry Rickett JrCarsonville, MI 48419$189,800
46Kenneth Earl LandsburgSandusky, MI 48471$186,474
47Edward Howard MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$182,762
48Ronald William MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$180,109
49Greenfield Farm IncPigeon, MI 48755$179,941
50Sulkowski & Sons Farms LLCWales, MI 48027$178,920
51Terry Wayne KrohnElkton, MI 48731$178,810
52Cedar Pond Farms IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$178,565
53Little-b Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$178,134
54Allan K Shaw IncMarlette, MI 48453$176,703
55Kretzschmer BrothersBay Port, MI 48720$173,797
56Jeffrey BrownGrant Township, MI 48032$173,322
57Lubeski Brothers LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$172,071
58Jahn's Farms IncCroswell, MI 48422$169,953
59Jeffrey M ShinnCroswell, MI 48422$169,570
60D & D Farms IncRuth, MI 48470$166,719

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag