SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='MI10' AND progcode='totalfarm ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,898

Recipients of Subtotal, Farming Subsidies from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $748,982,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
1995-2020
1Vandamme Farms Enterprise *Brown City, MI 48416$4,568,380
2Peters Brothers Farms *Riley, MI 48041$4,019,323
3Bischer Farms Partnership *Ruth, MI 48470$3,457,086
4Herford Brothers *Elkton, MI 48731$2,554,670
5J A D E *Pigeon, MI 48755$2,522,292
6Ken Miller Farms *Marlette, MI 48453$2,471,371
7R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farm *Bruce Twp, MI 48065$2,275,264
8P A M Growers *Caro, MI 48723$2,105,030
9Robert Charles WilsonBerlin, MI 48002$1,889,458
10Russell & Sons Farms LLC *Akron, MI 48701$1,878,901
11Mc Of Mc Inc *Minden City, MI 48456$1,867,375
12T & H Farms *Port Austin, MI 48467$1,843,085
13Palms Boys LLC *Palms, MI 48465$1,826,893
14Grout Farms Inc *Croswell, MI 48422$1,812,320
15John Gough Farms Inc *Deckerville, MI 48427$1,803,069
16Ronald Gaier Farms LLC *Armada, MI 48005$1,779,851
17Lakke Ewald Farms Inc *Unionville, MI 48767$1,688,297
18Ken JostockLapeer, MI 48446$1,672,286
19Allan K Shaw Inc *Marlette, MI 48453$1,669,893
20Wessel Bros & Son LLC *Columbus, MI 48063$1,661,055

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag