Total Emergency Relief Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 906
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $14,941,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Maynard Nelson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $80,099 |
22 | Kyle D Forsberg | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $78,172 |
23 | Chase Crawford | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $77,940 |
24 | Thomas M Bents | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $76,717 |
25 | L & K Farms Inc | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $76,184 |
26 | Dennis W Janssen | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $75,965 |
27 | Bacon Acres Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $75,273 |
28 | Goodrich Farms Llp | Easton, MN 56025 | $74,084 |
29 | Andrew D Englin | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $74,022 |
30 | James Freeman Hoppe | Saint James, MN 56081 | $73,041 |
31 | Tyler M Fields | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $72,075 |
32 | Kyle A Klinkner | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $71,940 |
33 | Highland Family Farms | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $70,759 |
34 | Dean Peters & Sons | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $69,499 |
35 | Jeffrey B Sayles | Austin, MN 55912 | $69,224 |
36 | Dennis L Becker | Easton, MN 56025 | $68,417 |
37 | Lickteig & Bastyr Farms LLC | Austin, MN 55912 | $68,121 |
38 | Gary Dannhoff | Mankato, MN 56001 | $67,147 |
39 | , | $66,967 | |
40 | Hislop Farms Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $66,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”