Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 995
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $34,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | M&m Family Farms LLC | Wells, MN 56097 | $121,826 |
42 | Todd Richard Britton | Janesville, MN 56048 | $121,440 |
43 | Douglas D Nimz | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $119,650 |
44 | Cory A Ransom | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $118,722 |
45 | Lac Lindeland Revocable Living Trust | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $117,962 |
46 | Bryce D Nelson | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $116,534 |
47 | James F Landsteiner | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $114,834 |
48 | Paul J Landsteiner | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $114,834 |
49 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $113,678 |
50 | Matthew J Wolle | Saint James, MN 56081 | $113,136 |
51 | Marvin Gene Guse | Janesville, MN 56048 | $112,754 |
52 | Julie Kay Weydert Knutson | Hartland, MN 56042 | $111,782 |
53 | Lynn B Griffith Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $110,709 |
54 | William J Daly | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $110,704 |
55 | Blackstad Farm Corp | Saint James, MN 56081 | $109,029 |
56 | Timothy J Paus | Dorchester, IA 52140 | $108,883 |
57 | David J Kline | Lyle, MN 55953 | $107,105 |
58 | Albert Schuster | Hartland, MN 56042 | $106,900 |
59 | Lyn Wessel | Truman, MN 56088 | $106,685 |
60 | Scott Thompson | Austin, MN 55912 | $106,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”