Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,158
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $60,822,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Viktora Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $150,025 |
42 | Scott W Sanders | Saint James, MN 56081 | $149,684 |
43 | Calvin And Jody Saxton Family Partnership | Granada, MN 56039 | $148,350 |
44 | Richard Stadheim II | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $145,920 |
45 | Goodrich Farms Llp | Easton, MN 56025 | $144,061 |
46 | Dale L Lachmiller | Garden City, MN 56034 | $143,841 |
47 | Flagship Pork Partner Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $139,235 |
48 | Gary Peterson | Hayward, MN 56043 | $135,834 |
49 | Bradley D Bowers | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $134,750 |
50 | Wangen Brothers Farms %ken Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $133,576 |
51 | Tlg Farm Partnership | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $131,565 |
52 | Pork Behrens Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $125,000 |
53 | Tony Weihe | Truman, MN 56088 | $125,000 |
54 | Paul T Hein | Welcome, MN 56181 | $125,000 |
55 | Duane D Meyer | Winnebago, MN 56098 | $125,000 |
56 | Scott A Fisher | Trimont, MN 56176 | $125,000 |
57 | Brent Tonne | Granada, MN 56039 | $125,000 |
58 | Bradley J Sherman | Truman, MN 56088 | $125,000 |
59 | Rollo Kosbab | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $125,000 |
60 | Mark G Hansen | Truman, MN 56088 | $125,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”