Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 6,023
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $301,271,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dewitz Farms Inc | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $377,728 |
42 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $375,000 |
43 | Mhf Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Austin, MN 55912 | $375,000 |
44 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $375,000 |
45 | Richard Raimann | Wells, MN 56097 | $375,000 |
46 | Michael Keith Fields | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $375,000 |
47 | Brian Redig | Wells, MN 56097 | $375,000 |
48 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $375,000 |
49 | Nienow Acres | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $375,000 |
50 | Lbh Partners Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $375,000 |
51 | Heidi Jean Stevermer | Easton, MN 56025 | $375,000 |
52 | Jc Bushlack Llp | Wells, MN 56097 | $375,000 |
53 | Central Fillmore Foods | Harmony, MN 55939 | $375,000 |
54 | F&h Partnership Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $375,000 |
55 | Jeffrey Hoppe | Truman, MN 56088 | $366,741 |
56 | Mensink Farms LLC | Preston, MN 55965 | $366,714 |
57 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $366,497 |
58 | Roe Farms Ptr | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $361,551 |
59 | Riverdale Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $359,814 |
60 | Sjs Farms | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $357,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”