Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 6,182
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $4,780,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Merwin E Thompson | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $6,715 |
82 | Noy Farms Inc | Vernon Center, MN 56090 | $6,714 |
83 | Duane W Flohrs | Ormsby, MN 56162 | $6,713 |
84 | Legried Farms Inc | Frost, MN 56033 | $6,650 |
85 | Larry Dean Mohwinkel | Saint James, MN 56081 | $6,580 |
86 | Jerry Bergey | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $6,568 |
87 | Charles Steven Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $6,521 |
88 | Bottem Farms Inc | Saint James, MN 56081 | $6,519 |
89 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $6,519 |
90 | Thilmer Legred | Bricelyn, MN 56014 | $6,501 |
91 | Lunz Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $6,497 |
92 | Keith George Morgan | Janesville, MN 56048 | $6,405 |
93 | Lynn S Olson | Amboy, MN 56010 | $6,377 |
94 | Steele Brothers Partnership | Alden, MN 56009 | $6,375 |
95 | Krause Inc | Winnebago, MN 56098 | $6,353 |
96 | Jim Peterson Agri Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $6,337 |
97 | Dennis Bremer | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $6,323 |
98 | James F Landsteiner | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $6,322 |
99 | Lawrence B Landsteiner | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $6,322 |
100 | Curtis R Lonergan | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $6,277 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”