Dairy Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 134
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $7,231,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Randy Drinkall | Rushford, MN 55971 | $15,685 |
102 | Gary & Lynn Ristau | Preston, MN 55965 | $15,527 |
103 | Larry Wiste | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $14,946 |
104 | Frederick L Williams | Mabel, MN 55954 | $14,927 |
105 | Joshua D Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $14,784 |
106 | Adam R Von Moos | Houston, MN 55943 | $14,699 |
107 | Gregory B Manke | Janesville, MN 56048 | $14,419 |
108 | James A Schmidt | Wykoff, MN 55990 | $14,239 |
109 | Mervin Lee Moen | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $13,905 |
110 | Roger A Von Moos | Houston, MN 55943 | $13,051 |
111 | Linda Betz | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $11,850 |
112 | Jonathan T Peterson | Peterson, MN 55962 | $11,595 |
113 | Kevin Virchow | Glenville, MN 56036 | $11,387 |
114 | Bradley J Von Arx | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $11,204 |
115 | , | $9,323 | |
116 | Michelle Anderson | Dexter, MN 55926 | $8,896 |
117 | Brian L Marzinske | Janesville, MN 56048 | $8,870 |
118 | Mr Mervin Lee Moen | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $8,643 |
119 | William R Appel | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $8,558 |
120 | Daniel Sorum | Rushford, MN 55971 | $8,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”