Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 4,525
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $18,627,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James B Griebel Farms Llp | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $25,276 |
102 | Jonathan P Schroeder | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $24,991 |
103 | Ricky Rannells | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $24,672 |
104 | Brett Beinke | Blaine, MN 55434 | $24,512 |
105 | Walter Paul Beinke | Garden City, MN 56034 | $24,512 |
106 | Gloria Trom | Austin, MN 55912 | $24,467 |
107 | Way-mar Farm Inc | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $24,463 |
108 | Neve Family Farms Of Chatfield Llp | Bonita Springs, FL 34135 | $24,446 |
109 | Deloris M Harber | Shiner, TX 77984 | $24,430 |
110 | Denise Rannells | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $24,135 |
111 | Lloyd Carlson | Odin, MN 56160 | $23,460 |
112 | Richard J Hansen | South Saint Paul, MN 55075 | $23,387 |
113 | Kenneth D Berg | Racine, MN 55967 | $23,084 |
114 | Larry Van Gundy | Houston, MN 55943 | $23,028 |
115 | Kvenvold Family LLC | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $23,014 |
116 | Wayne R Nelson | Alden, MN 56009 | $22,838 |
117 | Linda G Nelson | Alden, MN 56009 | $22,838 |
118 | Douglas Wichmann | Alden, MN 56009 | $22,776 |
119 | Heidi L Fjermestad | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $22,656 |
120 | Wayne Dietrich | Dexter, MN 55926 | $22,576 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”