Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 230
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $1,344,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gary E Tweito | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $2,507 |
102 | Lynn A Thomas | Preston, MN 55965 | $2,500 |
103 | Gary A Yokiel | Wells, MN 56097 | $2,495 |
104 | Greenview Farms LLC | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $2,489 |
105 | Zachary Kasten | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $2,487 |
106 | Hill Bros Partnership | Winnebago, MN 56098 | $2,471 |
107 | Trent J Hollerich | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $2,400 |
108 | Mark J Woitas | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $2,397 |
109 | Charles Brunsvold | Preston, MN 55965 | $2,246 |
110 | Paul Marx | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $2,233 |
111 | Robert Vernon Kappers | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,205 |
112 | Darin Gene Bratland | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $2,108 |
113 | Duron Jay Bratland | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $2,108 |
114 | Krueger Bros Farm LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $1,927 |
115 | John R Dvorak | Houston, MN 55943 | $1,817 |
116 | Jonathan T Peterson | Peterson, MN 55962 | $1,806 |
117 | Mary A Thomas | Preston, MN 55965 | $1,785 |
118 | Kurt Raaen | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $1,778 |
119 | Klassic Holsteins L L P | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,763 |
120 | Ruth Jovaag-ofstedal | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”