Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,445
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $4,251,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Shawn David Bergey | Harmony, MN 55939 | $6,539 |
122 | David Bergey | Harmony, MN 55939 | $6,524 |
123 | Timothy Geistfeld | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $6,363 |
124 | Troy Geistfeld | Truman, MN 56088 | $6,363 |
125 | Timothy Carpenter | Houston, MN 55943 | $6,318 |
126 | Josiah Layne Ebeling | Trimont, MN 56176 | $6,280 |
127 | Allan Routh | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $6,013 |
128 | Kevin S Nelson | Canton, MN 55922 | $5,967 |
129 | Schmidt Cattle Company LLC | Alden, MN 56009 | $5,887 |
130 | Clair Tieskotter | Harmony, MN 55939 | $5,869 |
131 | Nicholas Richard Ruen | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $5,771 |
132 | Leroy Victor Forsberg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $5,763 |
133 | Bunge Farms LLC | Eitzen, MN 55931 | $5,707 |
134 | Gary R Redalen | Fountain, MN 55935 | $5,676 |
135 | Judd Redalen | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $5,676 |
136 | Jordan Redalen | Fountain, MN 55935 | $5,676 |
137 | Ricky D Krueger | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $5,676 |
138 | Scott Sass | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $5,652 |
139 | Michael Paul Marquardt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $5,648 |
140 | Lanesboro Sales Comm Inc | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $5,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”