Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Minnesota
(Rep. Jim Hagedorn)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 5,564
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $34,376,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gary R Mullenbach | Adams, MN 55909 | $40,025 |
122 | Harold J Wolle Jr Revocable Living Trust | Madelia, MN 56062 | $39,803 |
123 | Zimmerman Pinedale Inc | Waseca, MN 56093 | $39,666 |
124 | Jeff-jeffrey K Pribb Pribbeno | Imperial, NE 69033 | $39,081 |
125 | John Ackerman | Farmington, MN 55024 | $39,080 |
126 | , | $38,975 | |
127 | Margaret Drury | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $38,847 |
128 | Steve And Anna Klug | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $38,550 |
129 | Anthony Buchholtz | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $38,370 |
130 | Curtis J Wagner | Brownsville, MN 55919 | $37,842 |
131 | Harguth Dairy Farms Inc | Waseca, MN 56093 | $37,644 |
132 | Phillip Suess | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $37,440 |
133 | , | $37,385 | |
134 | Marian Bahr | Granada, MN 56039 | $37,221 |
135 | Kelli O'connor | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $37,133 |
136 | Steven Garbisch | Brownsdale, MN 55918 | $36,710 |
137 | David Meschke | Welcome, MN 56181 | $36,287 |
138 | John C Lindeke | Preston, MN 55965 | $36,091 |
139 | Jace M Washburn | Rushford, MN 55971 | $35,892 |
140 | Root Prairie Holsteins LLC | Fountain, MN 55935 | $35,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”