Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 6,182
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $4,780,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bradley D Eckstrom | Saint James, MN 56081 | $5,214 |
142 | Richard Steele | Alden, MN 56009 | $5,208 |
143 | Paul Sikkink | Harmony, MN 55939 | $5,171 |
144 | Robert Gulbranson | Preston, MN 55965 | $5,164 |
145 | Arno A Mathews Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $5,148 |
146 | Mrj Farms Of Waltham Inc | Waltham, MN 55982 | $5,148 |
147 | Darrell L Rettke | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $5,127 |
148 | Melvin S Yunker | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $5,120 |
149 | J-ace Farms Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $5,119 |
150 | Huber Farms Inc | Elmore, MN 56027 | $5,108 |
151 | Gary D Parmenter | Austin, MN 55912 | $5,102 |
152 | David Reuter | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $5,100 |
153 | Edward Enderson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $5,098 |
154 | Robert Wolterman | Adams, MN 55909 | $5,091 |
155 | Jim A Sampson | Lyle, MN 55953 | $5,088 |
156 | William J Lyle | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $5,087 |
157 | Randy W Peter | Elmore, MN 56027 | $5,083 |
158 | Keith R Sayles | Austin, MN 55912 | $5,077 |
159 | Doran Kasel | Austin, MN 55912 | $5,076 |
160 | Albert Smith | Adams, MN 55909 | $5,075 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”