Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 18,736

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $2,953,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
161Schmidt Farms % Allen SchmidtAlden, MN 56009$1,515,825
162Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$1,515,532
163Craig A NelsenRose Creek, MN 55970$1,515,234
164Jeffrey J RomsdahlSaint James, MN 56081$1,508,027
165Central Fillmore FoodsHarmony, MN 55939$1,507,449
166Rabbe Ag Enterprises LLCTrimont, MN 56176$1,505,459
167Todd R ReihsMadelia, MN 56062$1,505,135
168Dominic F StierGrand Meadow, MN 55936$1,503,108
169Flagship Pork Partner LlpMapleton, MN 56065$1,501,797
170Huber Farms IncElmore, MN 56027$1,499,765
171Richard R NeuvirthElkton, MN 55933$1,494,530
172Calvin Keith PriemElysian, MN 56028$1,492,906
173Sandra LarsonFairmont, MN 56031$1,491,626
174Jeffrey MaloneyLewisville, MN 56060$1,491,169
175James Freeman HoppeSaint James, MN 56081$1,489,887
176TiloFairmont, MN 56031$1,480,791
177Sahrside Dairy LlpBricelyn, MN 56014$1,479,254
178John K NielsenAlbert Lea, MN 56007$1,478,537
179Eastfork Farm CorpCeylon, MN 56121$1,477,981
180Michele Darlene FieldsMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$1,472,492

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag