Oilseed Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 7,401
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $25,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | M Fitzsimmons & Sons | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $13,729 |
182 | Gregg Allen Rollins | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $13,705 |
183 | Ronald Coy | New Richland, MN 56072 | $13,674 |
184 | Rosenberg Farms Ptn | Welcome, MN 56181 | $13,653 |
185 | Dennis Richter | Alden, MN 56009 | $13,651 |
186 | Edward Goebel | Mankato, MN 56001 | $13,567 |
187 | Randy Goebel | Mankato, MN 56001 | $13,567 |
188 | Mike Brandts | Saint James, MN 56081 | $13,540 |
189 | Roger Peterson | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $13,537 |
190 | Stephen Dale Romsdahl | Saint James, MN 56081 | $13,535 |
191 | Dennis James Sorensen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $13,533 |
192 | Duane Darnell | Elmore, MN 56027 | $13,533 |
193 | Roger D Amundson | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $13,499 |
194 | Charles A Priebe | Waseca, MN 56093 | $13,477 |
195 | Larry Goslee | Austin, MN 55912 | $13,459 |
196 | Kenneth O Hartwig | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $13,456 |
197 | Richard Madson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $13,446 |
198 | Timothy Manthei | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $13,441 |
199 | Lee Manthei | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $13,441 |
200 | Weldon Ziemann | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $13,413 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”