Oilseed Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,401
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $25,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard J Walser | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $19,733 |
42 | Finseth Family Farms | Fountain, MN 55935 | $19,532 |
43 | Lundquist Bros | Janesville, MN 56048 | $19,523 |
44 | Richard Lickteig | Austin, MN 55912 | $19,439 |
45 | Wangen Brothers Farms %ken Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $19,377 |
46 | Keller Farms Inc | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $19,338 |
47 | Paulson Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $19,190 |
48 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $19,086 |
49 | M & M Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $18,820 |
50 | Dale E Lange | Saint James, MN 56081 | $18,811 |
51 | Duane Wigham | Adams, MN 55909 | $18,690 |
52 | Richard Horihan | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $18,660 |
53 | Terry J Guentzel | Kasota, MN 56050 | $18,631 |
54 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $18,629 |
55 | Caldwell Farms | Amboy, MN 56010 | $18,593 |
56 | Craig S Weir | Delavan, MN 56023 | $18,513 |
57 | James Cornish | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | $18,476 |
58 | Dennis And Jennifer Bremer | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $18,465 |
59 | Huber Farms Inc | Elmore, MN 56027 | $18,396 |
60 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $18,328 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”