Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 995

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $34,548,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
41M&m Family Farms LLCWells, MN 56097$121,826
42Todd Richard BrittonJanesville, MN 56048$121,440
43Douglas D NimzBlue Earth, MN 56013$119,650
44Cory A RansomRose Creek, MN 55970$118,722
45Lac Lindeland Revocable Living TrustMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$117,962
46Bryce D NelsonRose Creek, MN 55970$116,534
47James F LandsteinerMapleton, MN 56065$114,834
48Paul J LandsteinerMapleton, MN 56065$114,834
49Todd Dale JoecksNew Richland, MN 56072$113,678
50Matthew J WolleSaint James, MN 56081$113,136
51Marvin Gene GuseJanesville, MN 56048$112,754
52Julie Kay Weydert KnutsonHartland, MN 56042$111,782
53Lynn B Griffith IncMadelia, MN 56062$110,709
54William J DalyMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$110,704
55Blackstad Farm CorpSaint James, MN 56081$109,029
56Timothy J PausDorchester, IA 52140$108,883
57David J KlineLyle, MN 55953$107,105
58Albert SchusterHartland, MN 56042$106,900
59Lyn WesselTruman, MN 56088$106,685
60Scott ThompsonAustin, MN 55912$106,629

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag