Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 186
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $1,096,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wangen Brothers Farms %ken Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $23,750 |
2 | Douglas L Eisenmenger | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $11,875 |
3 | Todd Hendrickson | Preston, MN 55965 | $11,875 |
4 | Gary Angell | Elkton, MN 55933 | $11,875 |
5 | Vaughn W Kuehl | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $11,875 |
6 | Daniel Rosenberg | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $11,875 |
7 | Rick Helget | Saint James, MN 56081 | $11,875 |
8 | Tad Alan Engstrom | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $11,875 |
9 | Richard Kelly | Saint James, MN 56081 | $11,875 |
10 | Douglas Dale Christopherson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,875 |
11 | Joseph W Stevermer | Easton, MN 56025 | $11,875 |
12 | Paul Schmidt | Preston, MN 55965 | $11,875 |
13 | David Meschke | Welcome, MN 56181 | $11,875 |
14 | W John Hungerholt | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $11,875 |
15 | Mary Lou Graf | Hokah, MN 55941 | $11,875 |
16 | Dale Kosbab | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $11,875 |
17 | Clint A Mcgill | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $11,875 |
18 | Jack May | Mankato, MN 56001 | $11,875 |
19 | Eugene Kelly | Saint James, MN 56081 | $11,875 |
20 | Bruce Eisenmenger | Welcome, MN 56181 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>