Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 13,059

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $447,552,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
21Enstad BrosGranite Falls, MN 56241$462,646
22Evan And Brett Peterson FarmsBalaton, MN 56115$459,536
23Loren-deborah And Ron Zutz JvWarren, MN 56762$456,296
24Damon & Ashley Stroble PartnershipAngus, MN 56762$422,156
25Jirak Bros Farming PartnershipBreckenridge, MN 56520$421,401
26Jeffrey J MonroeWarren, MN 56762$420,786
27Bell Bank **Fargo, ND 58103$416,209
28Nsk FarmsHerman, MN 56248$407,361
29Prosser Kuznia GpGreenbush, MN 56726$399,490
30Dahl Family Farms PartnershipGlyndon, MN 56547$399,251
31Brouwer FarmsRaymond, MN 56282$396,898
32Brutlag Farms PartnershipWendell, MN 56590$391,296
33Holleman FarmsBenson, MN 56215$385,388
34Buesing Ag PartnershipGranite Falls, MN 56241$383,430
35Koosmann Farms PartnershipBig Stone City, SD 57216$371,814
36Ejr FarmsHallock, MN 56728$357,116
37Horning Bros Farms Lmted PtshpChokio, MN 56221$348,537
38Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$346,331
39Kasin FarmsHawley, MN 56549$345,887
40Deal Bros Farming PartnershipDoran, MN 56522$345,448

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag