Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,369
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $63,224,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Noel T Joppru | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $59,712 |
22 | Donald Joppru | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $59,336 |
23 | Jason And Erik Investments LLC | Blaine, MN 55449 | $58,516 |
24 | John Moon | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $58,508 |
25 | A & P Business | Middle River, MN 56737 | $58,226 |
26 | Jeff Boom | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $57,088 |
27 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $57,082 |
28 | Clifford M Hanson Inc | Ada, MN 56510 | $56,652 |
29 | George Langelett | Brookings, SD 57006 | $56,311 |
30 | , | $56,035 | |
31 | Freilinger Farms Partnership | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $55,790 |
32 | Ruth Haagenson | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $55,685 |
33 | Linda M Lindemoen | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $54,732 |
34 | Eric And Gail Petersen Family Farm Lp | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $54,422 |
35 | Scott Swenson | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $54,174 |
36 | Bernard Piotter | Holloway, MN 56249 | $53,848 |
37 | Richard L Moen | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $53,324 |
38 | , | $52,716 | |
39 | Inmaculada Kusnierek | Springfield, OH 45502 | $51,332 |
40 | , | $50,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”