Commodity Certificates in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 283
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $8,094,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leslie R Enevoldsen | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $46,440 |
62 | Patrick Maanum | Johnson, MN 56236 | $45,675 |
63 | Gary D Sonstegard | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $45,348 |
64 | Daniel Albert Renkly | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $45,000 |
65 | Gary Gades | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $44,106 |
66 | Joseph J Devaan | De Graff, MN 56271 | $44,000 |
67 | Jon Mathias | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $43,420 |
68 | Gordon Farms II Inc | Murdock, MN 56271 | $43,116 |
69 | Stanley B Claussen | Benson, MN 56215 | $41,674 |
70 | Kevin Yaggie | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $41,569 |
71 | Lacey Ridge Farm Company | Wendell, MN 56590 | $39,000 |
72 | Kraig L Lee | Wannaska, MN 56761 | $38,176 |
73 | Sheila Ronhovde | Barrett, MN 56311 | $37,843 |
74 | Leonard Wulf & Sons Inc | Morris, MN 56267 | $37,465 |
75 | Douglas Dejong | Boyd, MN 56218 | $37,061 |
76 | Davison Inc | Tintah, MN 56583 | $36,900 |
77 | Douglas Etten | Dalton, MN 56324 | $36,513 |
78 | Trautman Farms Inc | Mankato, MN 56001 | $35,700 |
79 | Dean G Sternhagen | Barrett, MN 56311 | $35,700 |
80 | Lane Alan Schwitters | Raymond, MN 56282 | $35,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”