Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 10,456
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $59,754,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dianne Watne | Gully, MN 56646 | $47,317 |
62 | Clinton E Bauer | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $47,253 |
63 | Steven R Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $47,061 |
64 | Rebekah Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $47,061 |
65 | Donna M Nelson-arneson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $47,037 |
66 | John M Peter J & Steven F Thompson Whiskey Creek F | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $46,895 |
67 | Lynn Allen Hammer | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $46,684 |
68 | Calvin Harstad | Viking, MN 56760 | $46,511 |
69 | Evert Langelett | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $46,492 |
70 | , | $46,421 | |
71 | Carol Hammer | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $46,256 |
72 | James Brown Jr | Wayzata, MN 55391 | $46,165 |
73 | Richard F Zejdlik Trust | Minneapolis, MN 55413 | $45,736 |
74 | Thomas S Veigel | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $45,690 |
75 | Donald Julius Omang Jr | Gully, MN 56646 | $45,345 |
76 | , | $45,345 | |
77 | Weigand Family Partnership | New Brighton, MN 55112 | $45,304 |
78 | Roy J Stewart | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $45,236 |
79 | Rick Forsberg | Gully, MN 56646 | $44,947 |
80 | , | $44,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”