Dairy Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,930
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $44,139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jerome Schmit | Trail, MN 56684 | $111,077 |
82 | David Schliep | Holloway, MN 56249 | $110,361 |
83 | Andy Emmert | Hancock, MN 56244 | $110,343 |
84 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $109,698 |
85 | David A Thompson | Starbuck, MN 56381 | $108,794 |
86 | Remiger Dairy LLC | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $107,600 |
87 | Robert W Kallemeyn Living Trust | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $107,369 |
88 | District 45 Dairy Llp | Morris, MN 56267 | $106,898 |
89 | Dublin Dairy Llp | De Graff, MN 56271 | $106,133 |
90 | Karen Marie Boogaard | Osakis, MN 56360 | $105,157 |
91 | David R Popowski | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $103,826 |
92 | Arne Kleppe | Gonvick, MN 56644 | $103,582 |
93 | Ronald Theodore Eischens | Canby, MN 56220 | $103,088 |
94 | Michael J Myhre | Minneota, MN 56264 | $103,015 |
95 | West River Dairy Llp | Morris, MN 56267 | $102,115 |
96 | Peter D Louwagie | Cottonwood, MN 56229 | $101,793 |
97 | Scott L Louwagie | Cottonwood, MN 56229 | $101,793 |
98 | Bernard M Moorse Jr | Minneota, MN 56264 | $101,539 |
99 | Peter Ruegemer | Villard, MN 56385 | $101,483 |
100 | Travis J Amundson | Ulen, MN 56585 | $101,341 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”