Total Disaster Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 6,147
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $251,230,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jason L Keller | Bejou, MN 56516 | $264,135 |
82 | Barry Walton | Middle River, MN 56737 | $264,084 |
83 | Deal Bros Farming Partnership | Doran, MN 56522 | $262,156 |
84 | Jeffrey J Petry | Ada, MN 56510 | $261,878 |
85 | Ronald D Mattson | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $261,496 |
86 | Bakke Family Farms | Ulen, MN 56585 | $260,699 |
87 | Thomas A Scholin | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $259,967 |
88 | Wade Joppru | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $258,678 |
89 | J & M Chwialkowski Partnership | Argyle, MN 56713 | $258,360 |
90 | Todd Manthe | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $257,903 |
91 | Todd Michael Stenerson | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $254,309 |
92 | Joseph Wulfekuhle | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $253,034 |
93 | Jon L Wilson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $251,594 |
94 | Kris M Folland | Halma, MN 56729 | $251,544 |
95 | Gary Schlick | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $251,170 |
96 | Keith Budke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $250,708 |
97 | Johnsrud Bros | Starbuck, MN 56381 | $250,000 |
98 | Dale M Nelson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $250,000 |
99 | Larry Tschakert | Kent, MN 56553 | $250,000 |
100 | Kyle Mehrkens | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”