Counter Cyclical Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 13,321
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $113,773,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael Paul Ascheman | Kensington, MN 56343 | $74,690 |
102 | Richard A Buysse | Minneota, MN 56264 | $74,687 |
103 | Schaefer Bros Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $74,653 |
104 | Philip J Goff | Benson, MN 56215 | $74,456 |
105 | Michael James Goff | Benson, MN 56215 | $74,455 |
106 | Roy Koehl | Morris, MN 56267 | $74,399 |
107 | Michael A Thompson | Dawson, MN 56232 | $74,361 |
108 | Thomas Palke | Willmar, MN 56201 | $74,272 |
109 | Felix Frisch & Sons Inc | Dumont, MN 56236 | $74,112 |
110 | G & J Schwitters Farm Inc | Clara City, MN 56222 | $73,251 |
111 | Mattson Acres Lllp | Farwell, MN 56327 | $73,169 |
112 | Stelzig Family Farms Inc | Danvers, MN 56231 | $72,935 |
113 | Allen R Steffes | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $72,780 |
114 | Robert Enevoldsen | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $72,715 |
115 | Mark T Grussing | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $72,651 |
116 | Stanley B Claussen | Benson, MN 56215 | $72,585 |
117 | Jj & P Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $72,358 |
118 | Kemen Farms | Madison, MN 56256 | $71,741 |
119 | Daniel Jepma | Starbuck, MN 56381 | $71,624 |
120 | Tubbs Ag Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $71,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”