Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,891

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $348,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
121Ejr FarmsHallock, MN 56728$232,986
122Loyson Farms IncGhent, MN 56239$232,542
123Oberg Farms PrtshpMoorhead, MN 56560$232,373
124Brad Don LunkeThief River Falls, MN 56701$232,327
125Chuck MeixelStarbuck, MN 56381$231,176
126Brent CosleyPembina, ND 58271$230,798
127Stark Partnership LLCVesta, MN 56292$230,299
128Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$229,652
129Trevor Michael TelkampHoffman, MN 56339$229,589
130Daco Farms IncHancock, MN 56244$227,901
131River Valley FarmsBreckenridge, MN 56520$225,774
132Deere Farms IncHallock, MN 56728$225,405
133Hancock Pro-porkHancock, MN 56244$223,835
134Vatthauer FarmRed Lake Falls, MN 56750$223,629
135Douglas DejongBoyd, MN 56218$223,038
136Yaggie Farms Jeffrey & JanetBreckenridge, MN 56520$221,543
137Jensen Farms PrtshpStephen, MN 56757$221,314
138Robert Alvin ToelleBrowns Valley, MN 56219$219,572
139Rhoda A HabedankTwin Valley, MN 56584$219,347
140Nsk FarmsHerman, MN 56248$219,126

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag