Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Minnesota
(Rep. Collin Peterson)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 52,631
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $6,814,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Wcd Brendemuhl Farms Ptrshp | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $2,605,617 |
| 62 | Holleman Farms | Benson, MN 56215 | $2,560,415 |
| 63 | Payne Partnership | De Graff, MN 56271 | $2,552,698 |
| 64 | Raguse Farms | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,547,978 |
| 65 | Woinarowicz Bros Jv | Stephen, MN 56757 | $2,533,733 |
| 66 | Mark William Melby | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $2,528,219 |
| 67 | Engelstad Farms Of Rocksbury Part | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $2,504,002 |
| 68 | Landbruk Farms Partnership | Borup, MN 56519 | $2,485,307 |
| 69 | P & W Farms | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $2,466,989 |
| 70 | Ramstad Brothers | Ada, MN 56510 | $2,460,799 |
| 71 | Craig S Lichtsinn | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,456,013 |
| 72 | Black Bell Farms | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $2,434,714 |
| 73 | R & B Farms Jv | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $2,433,739 |
| 74 | Abel Farms Of Breckenridge Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $2,420,681 |
| 75 | Blarco Ventures | Murdock, MN 56271 | $2,389,854 |
| 76 | Kemen Farms | Madison, MN 56256 | $2,388,625 |
| 77 | Jon Mathias | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $2,377,285 |
| 78 | Erik Nymann | Plummer, MN 56748 | $2,365,717 |
| 79 | Lacey Ridge Farm Company | Wendell, MN 56590 | $2,365,136 |
| 80 | Petersen Farms Inc | Murdock, MN 56271 | $2,358,487 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf