Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,389
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $302,715,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $4,457,553 |
| 2 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $1,361,816 |
| 3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,271,999 |
| 4 | Skaurud Grain Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $1,021,073 |
| 5 | Oberg Grain | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $886,378 |
| 6 | Deal Bros Farming Partnership | Doran, MN 56522 | $886,363 |
| 7 | Choice Financial Group ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $655,646 |
| 8 | Bauer Farms | Erskine, MN 56535 | $562,799 |
| 9 | Magnusson Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $538,514 |
| 10 | American Federal Bank ** | Fosston, MN 56542 | $480,859 |
| 11 | Hess Farms Ptsp | Brooks, MN 56715 | $472,111 |
| 12 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $459,813 |
| 13 | Big Stone Hutterian Brethren Inc II | Graceville, MN 56240 | $430,639 |
| 14 | State Bank Of Wheaton | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $425,545 |
| 15 | Field Brothers Farms Gp | Stephen, MN 56757 | $419,947 |
| 16 | Jirak Bros Farming Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $416,792 |
| 17 | Brian & Kevin Kuehl Farms | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $416,670 |
| 18 | Buesing Ag Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $403,613 |
| 19 | Four K Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $398,097 |
| 20 | Vipond Grain Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $395,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf