Market Loss Assistance Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 18,678
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $341,965,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | North America Farms | Wheatland, IA 52777 | $189,806 |
42 | Circle M | Warren, MN 56762 | $188,513 |
43 | Raymond C Bitker & Sons Ptrs | Halstad, MN 56548 | $186,814 |
44 | Eeg Farms | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $186,662 |
45 | Nelson Brothers Gen Prtshp | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $185,960 |
46 | Green Acres Dairy | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $183,057 |
47 | Gullickson Farms | Farwell, MN 56327 | $181,001 |
48 | Ostenaa Farms | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $179,422 |
49 | Swanson Farms | Hallock, MN 56728 | $178,272 |
50 | Lundberg Bros Ptnshp | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $177,210 |
51 | Quinbro Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $175,348 |
52 | Triple D Farms Ptshp | Herman, MN 56248 | $170,576 |
53 | M & J Farms Inc | Hawley, MN 56549 | $167,499 |
54 | Landsverk Dairy Inc | Fosston, MN 56542 | $166,296 |
55 | Sobolik Farms | Hallock, MN 56728 | $166,128 |
56 | Engelstad Farms Of Rocksbury Part | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $165,096 |
57 | E & J Farms | Argyle, MN 56713 | $162,814 |
58 | Wear Farms | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $162,329 |
59 | Haugo Brothers | Waubun, MN 56589 | $160,807 |
60 | Deere Farms | Hallock, MN 56728 | $160,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”