Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 33,933

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $1,604,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Doug R Nelson IncLancaster, MN 56735$1,056,080
22A & P BusinessMiddle River, MN 56737$1,048,756
23Bernard PiotterHolloway, MN 56249$1,045,306
24Lynn Allen HammerThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,044,142
25B Bar B Ranch IncFelton, MN 56536$1,015,291
26Rodahl Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,009,037
27Willis A JohnsonMesa, AZ 85215$1,008,503
28Delmer NeslandOklee, MN 56742$986,853
29Clinton E BauerThief River Falls, MN 56701$976,526
30Ulrich Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$961,931
31Donna M Nelson-arnesonThief River Falls, MN 56701$954,925
32Reuben LindLake Bronson, MN 56734$952,433
33Ron Lesser LLCBloomington, IL 61704$944,912
34Richard NicholsonLancaster, MN 56735$942,324
35Calvin HarstadViking, MN 56760$933,713
36Horst G Lesser TrustGrand Rapids, MI 49515$926,108
37Jerroll PetersonLancaster, MN 56735$922,090
38United Grain & Livestock IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$918,300
39Raymond KvalvogMoorhead, MN 56560$913,490
40Gregory T DyrdalThief River Falls, MN 56701$911,436

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag