Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,293
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $315,685,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Buesing Ag Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $403,613 |
| 22 | Vipond Grain Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $401,912 |
| 23 | Haugo Brothers | Waubun, MN 56589 | $401,701 |
| 24 | Evan And Brett Peterson Farms | Balaton, MN 56115 | $393,227 |
| 25 | Kuznia General Partnership | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $379,485 |
| 26 | Thomas Herberg | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $375,000 |
| 27 | Lismore Hutterian Brethren Inc | Clinton, MN 56225 | $364,638 |
| 28 | Enstad Bros | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $351,411 |
| 29 | Boerboom Ag Resources LLC | Marshall, MN 56258 | $339,708 |
| 30 | Dave & Beth Eiynck Ptnr | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $337,639 |
| 31 | Joe Bienek | Warren, MN 56762 | $334,429 |
| 32 | Robert And Darlene Yaggie Farms | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $332,973 |
| 33 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $330,747 |
| 34 | Bruce Yaggie Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $325,650 |
| 35 | Prosser Kuznia Gp | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $318,594 |
| 36 | Cole Nymann | Plummer, MN 56748 | $318,472 |
| 37 | Raguse Family Partnership | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $315,543 |
| 38 | Conestoga Farm | Pembina, ND 58271 | $309,908 |
| 39 | Anthony Wulfekuhle | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $298,725 |
| 40 | Sparby Brothers | Grygla, MN 56727 | $291,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf