Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 650
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $4,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donald A Mckenzie | Braham, MN 55006 | $12,005 |
102 | Troy M Salzer | Barnum, MN 55707 | $11,996 |
103 | Sunny Section Farm Inc | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $11,617 |
104 | Daniel E Olean | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $11,579 |
105 | Robert Downing | Pine City, MN 55063 | $11,530 |
106 | Jerome Effertz | Pine City, MN 55063 | $11,492 |
107 | Richard Muellner | Rush City, MN 55069 | $11,167 |
108 | Tim Laman | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $11,128 |
109 | Brian Belkholm | Mora, MN 55051 | $10,875 |
110 | Allen Woitalla | Pierz, MN 56364 | $10,815 |
111 | Scott W Walbridge | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $10,815 |
112 | George Bowman | Blackduck, MN 56630 | $10,679 |
113 | James Sypnieski | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $10,576 |
114 | Leonard Koering | Fort Ripley, MN 56449 | $10,549 |
115 | Robert Brink | Spicer, MN 56288 | $10,548 |
116 | Gary Soens | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $10,432 |
117 | Douglas Dickmann | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $10,387 |
118 | Edward France Jr | Pine City, MN 55063 | $10,376 |
119 | John E Vonrueden | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $10,261 |
120 | Russell Woitalla | Pierz, MN 56364 | $10,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”