Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 326
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $2,524,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Matthew Merrick | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,531 |
142 | Melvin Kadlec | Mora, MN 55051 | $3,501 |
143 | Charles M Anderson | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $3,471 |
144 | Robert Kraft | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,376 |
145 | Joel Kennedy | Brook Park, MN 55007 | $3,327 |
146 | Archie Winans | Mountain Iron, MN 55768 | $3,276 |
147 | Howard Sizer | Grasston, MN 55030 | $3,267 |
148 | Donald Kooiman | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $3,255 |
149 | Aaron C Bos | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $3,251 |
150 | Alvin L Jacobson | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $3,243 |
151 | Patrick Kraklau | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $3,186 |
152 | Don Warner | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $3,166 |
153 | Robert Lee Linkert | Mora, MN 55051 | $3,160 |
154 | Harold Schroeder Est | Coon Rapids, MN 55433 | $3,023 |
155 | Marilyn Hovland Living Trust | Mora, MN 55051 | $2,849 |
156 | Gene Sherman Est | New Brighton, MN 55112 | $2,799 |
157 | Milo Kadlec | Brook Park, MN 55007 | $2,784 |
158 | Dudley Gangestad | Fort Ripley, MN 56449 | $2,718 |
159 | Gene Paulson | Carlton, MN 55718 | $2,700 |
160 | Jacob R. Ketchmark | Sturgeon Lake, MN 55783 | $2,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”